(A)Political - October 18th

Good morning everyone,

The busy week on Capitol Hill should keep you at least mildly entertained. We’ve got very exciting news to share soon! Let’s get into it!

Trump has used his two edged sword again this week as he pardons former rep George Santos, while moving forward with the prosecution of a foe. A lack of funds send the federal courts into ‘essentials-only’ mode. A US led coalition has nullified any vote this year on the carbon tax being pushed by the UN.

• Pardons & Prosecutions

• Furloughs Hit Federal Courts

• US Led Coalition Nullifies UN Push For Global Carbon Tax

Pardons & Prosecutions

_{By: Atlas}

The Trump administration pressed forward on two high-profile justice decisions this week: advocating federal prosecution of former National Security Adviser John Bolton while granting clemency to former Rep. George Santos. Bolton surrendered at the federal courthouse in Greenbelt, Maryland, and pleaded not guilty to an 18-count indictment alleging unlawful transmission and retention of national defense information. Hours later, the White House announced the commutation of Santos’s prison sentence, ordering his immediate release after he had served part of an 87-month term for fraud and identity theft. Taken together, the actions highlight the administration’s posture toward critics and allies, and the extent of presidential influence over the Justice Department and executive clemency.

The Bolton Case: Charges and Initial Proceedings

Federal prosecutors unsealed an indictment charging Bolton with eight counts of transmitting national defense information and ten counts of unlawful retention under the Espionage Act framework. According to the charging documents summarized in court, investigators contend Bolton sent “diary-like” entries—some marked up to Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information—through personal accounts to two individuals who did not hold clearances, described as family members. The government also alleges he kept classified material in his home and failed to notify authorities after his personal email was compromised in 2021.

At his initial appearance, Bolton confirmed he had reviewed the indictment and entered a plea of not guilty. He was released on his own recognizance with conditions that include surrendering his passport and seeking approval for international travel. The magistrate judge set deadlines for pretrial motions and scheduled a status conference with the district judge in late November. Maximum statutory exposure on the charged counts totals up to 180 years, though sentencing guidelines and judicial discretion make such an outcome unlikely even in the event of conviction.

Bolton, who served from 2018 to 2019 and later published a memoir sharply critical of the first Trump administration, has rejected the allegations. Through counsel, he argues the Justice Department previously examined similar facts and declined to proceed, and that the materials at issue were personal notes not intended to disclose protected intelligence. Federal agents searched his Maryland residence and Washington, D.C., office in August, and the indictment followed with the department framing the case as a straightforward enforcement of classification laws.

Administration Position and Justice Department Statements

Senior law enforcement officials said the case was brought by a grand jury based on evidence gathered over months, including materials retrieved during searches. The FBI stated that Bolton transmitted classified information using personal online accounts and retained restricted documents at his home, conduct they characterized as a direct violation of federal law. The Attorney General said the charges reflect a uniform standard—“one tier of justice”—for mishandling secrets, regardless of the defendant’s prior position.

The White House has not publicly discussed internal deliberations specific to Bolton’s prosecution beyond referring questions to the Justice Department. However, Bolton has asserted that the renewed case represents retaliation by the president against a prominent critic, repeating his view that the matter was “investigated and resolved years ago.” The dispute underscores a long-running tension over classification enforcement when allegations involve a former senior official who later became a political opponent. For the moment, the case proceeds on a standard criminal track: arraignment completed, discovery to follow, and a pretrial schedule to be set.

Santos Clemency: Scope and Immediate Effects

On the same day, President Trump commuted the sentence of George Santos, the former New York congressman who pleaded guilty to fraud and identity-theft offenses tied to his political fundraising and personal finances. The commutation reduced the punishment to time served and directed Santos’s immediate release from federal custody. A commutation does not vacate the conviction; it alters the penalty. Santos, expelled from the House in 2023 after an ethics investigation and later sentenced to more than seven years, had appealed to the administration for relief. Allies on Capitol Hill had also urged clemency, arguing his punishment was excessive compared with penalties other public figures have received for financial crimes.

The White House framed the decision as correcting a disproportionate sentence and cited concerns about Santos’s confinement conditions. The announcement followed public statements from the president on social media contending that Santos was treated more harshly than other officials who have faced credibility or ethics controversies. With the commutation signed, Bureau of Prisons procedures for release were initiated, and Santos was expected to leave the facility once processing was complete. The former lawmaker remains a convicted felon; the order does not erase the underlying judgment or related collateral consequences, though it ends his incarceration.

Legal and Political Implications

Legally, the two actions rely on distinct authorities: criminal prosecution through the Justice Department and Article II clemency powers vested in the presidency. The Bolton case will test the government’s evidence on classification handling, unauthorized transmission, and retention in a home setting. Prosecutors must show that the materials meet statutory definitions and that the alleged transmissions occurred as charged. The defense is likely to scrutinize classification markings, clearance procedures, and whether any disclosures were authorized or subsequently declassified. The court has already imposed standard conditions and will manage discovery disputes common in national security cases, including the use of the Classified Information Procedures Act.

The Santos commutation illustrates the breadth of presidential clemency, which may be exercised at any time after conviction and sentencing. Unlike a pardon, a commutation does not convey forgiveness; it simply shortens or eliminates the penalty. The practical effects are immediate for Santos but do not alter the historical record of his guilty plea or expulsion from Congress. Politically, the juxtaposition of clemency for a onetime ally and prosecution of a high-profile critic invites scrutiny of priorities, yet each action sits within recognized executive powers. Supporters of the president describe an effort to impose uniform rules on classified handling and to correct perceived sentencing disparities. Critics see differential treatment tied to personal relationships and political disputes.

What Comes Next

In the coming weeks, the Bolton case will move through routine pretrial stages: protective orders governing classified materials, deadlines for motions, and potential litigation over access to and use of sensitive information at trial. Any superseding indictment or dismissal of particular counts would occur through the same docket and be reflected in updated filings. For Santos, the Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Probation will address post-release supervision conditions, if any, associated with his conviction and sentence as modified by the commutation. Additional clemency actions—pardons or commutations affecting other figures—remain at the president’s discretion and could be announced without advance notice.

Subscribe to (A)Political to read the rest.